Sat, May 18, 2024
Text Size
Thursday, 30 December 2021 08:55

Financial Times analysis flags up under-investment and £multi-billion shareholder payments by 10 biggest water companies

The Financial Times has published two separate articles flagging up decades of under-investment by the water companies in their networks while paying £73 billion in dividends to shareholders.

CSO OVERFLOW

The articles draw on new research by the leading business publication which shows that six out of 10 companies increased their capital investment in the 1990s as part of their work to meet new European Union targets under EU water quality Directives.

However, according to the FT, the level of investment has not been sustained.

In an article dated 22nd December entitled England’s water groups slashed investment in sewage network in recent decades, the newspapersays“eight of the 10 biggest water and wastewater companies are investing less in infrastructure now than they were in the1990s.”

A separate article published on 28th December entitled Sewage spills highlight decades of under-investment at England’s water companies suggests that “investment fell as dividends fl owed”

“Research by the Financial Times showed that total capital expenditure by the 10 biggest water and sewage monopolies had declined by 15 per cent since the 1990s — from £5.7bn to £4.8bn a year.”, the article states.

According to the FT, since privatisation in the 1990 by the ten companies have borrowed £53 billion, much of which “has been used not for new investment but to pay £72 billion in dividends.”

The FT has included the following comment by Professor Dieter Helm, leading utilities expert at Oxford University and previously chair of the Government’s independent advisory Natural Capital Committee which ran from 2012 to December 2020: “The purpose of private water companies has indeed been to profit-maximise.”

The article says Helm argues it was “implausible” that Ofwat could allow companies to “raise prices high enough to pay for the extent of the upgrades required for the (sewage) network during the next regulatory period” and that “wider reform of the regulatory system was needed.”

Both articles make reference to continuing public anger on the issues of thousands of storm overflows which allow water companies to discharge sewage into rivers and seas following heavy rain. 

The story on 28th December says:

"While public anger towards water companies has been bubbling for years, it has erupted in the past few months, as unknown quantities of raw sewage and stormwater have repeatedly been poured into Britain’s rivers and seas, increasing pressure on the government and regulators to act."

News Showcase

Sign up to receive the Waterbriefing newsletter:


Watch

Click here for more...

Login / Register




Forgot login?

New Account Registrations

To register for a new account with Waterbriefing, please contact us via email at waterbriefing@imsbis.org

Existing waterbriefing users - log into the new website using your original username and the new password 'waterbriefing'. You can then change your password once logged in.

Advertise with Waterbriefing

WaterBriefing is the UK’s leading online daily dedicated news and intelligence service for business professionals in the water sector – covering both UK and international issues. Advertise with us for an unrivalled opportunity to place your message in front of key influencers, decision makers and purchasers.

Find out more

About Waterbriefing

Water Briefing is an information service, delivering daily news, company data and product information straight to the desks of purchasers, users and specifiers of equipment and services in the UK water and wastewater industry.


Find out more