A new report says that last year governments and companies invested $9.6 billion in initiatives implementing nature-based solutions to sustain the world’s clean water supplies.
According to the report from Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace, the funding – which supports healthy watersheds that naturally filter water, absorb storm surge, and perform other critical functions –covered more than seven million households and restored and protected a total of 365 million hectares (ha) of land, an area larger than India.
Up from $8.2B in investment tracked in 2011, the researchers say the sector’s continued growth and near-doubling of the hundreds of operational programs reflects governments’ desire to secure water quality and availability with affordable strategies that can complement or replace industrial infrastructure.
Michael Jenkins, President and CEO of Forest Trends commented:
“Forests, wetlands, and other water-rich ecosystems are the first line of defense against the rising cost and receding availability of clean, healthy water. Governments and businesses are finding that investment in watersheds is a cost-effective way to close the gap between what communities have and what they need to manage watersheds.”
Gaining Depth: State of Watershed Investment 2014 reports that more than 90% of watershed investment came from national public subsidies, including $8.8B attributed to Chinese government programs that compensate landowners to restore watersheds in order to address ongoing water pollution and supply challenges. Elsewhere, governments paid farmers, forest managers, and other landowners to adopt water-friendly practices such as removing invasive plants, using less fertilizer, or replanting forests.
The private sector invested another $41 million into watershed health. Particularly active were businesses with obvious exposure to water-related risks, like private water utilities and the food and beverage sector. The Coca-Cola Company alone has invested at least $2.2M to date to support 20 such projects worldwide.
“Environmental risk mitigation is clearly driving private investment in watershed health,” said lead report author Genevieve Bennett. “Water companies, for example, are finding it more cost-effective to pay for healthy forests that mitigate fire or flood risks upstream, rather than to face supply disruptions after an extreme event.”
However, other risk-exposed businesses such as energy utilities or agricultural producers w were less active in 2013, with market participants linking under-investment to continued uncertainty around the water regulations that incentivize or compel restoration payments, as well as a lack of clear information about programs’ return on investment (ROI).
“The potential for scale is tremendous if the conservation world can deliver this kind of business
intelligence,” says Ecosystem Marketplace Associate Director Nathaniel Carroll. “Buyers need to have a better sense of watershed projects’ ROI, whether that is measured as gallons of aquifer recharge, or as cost savings or some other dollar value. It’s here that we see a lot of advancements and promise.”
Respondents to Ecosystem Marketplace’s survey reported $6 billion that has already been committed to watershed investment activities through 2020. Leaders in the field are now looking to the private sector, climate finance, and the re-allocation of infrastructure spending as future financing channels.
Click here to download the Executive Summary
“SAS (Surplus Activated Sludge) is a bit weird and
Owen Mace has taken over as Director of the British Plastics Federation (BPF) Plastic Pipes Group on the retirement of Caroline Ayres. He was previously Standards and Technical Manager for the group.
Hear how United Utilities is accelerating its investment to reduce spills from storm overflows across the Northwest.